| Accessories By Manufacturer | |
|
|
Email Newsletter
Get info on Sales, Events, New Products, and More!
|
|
|
|
|
| What Came Before He Shot Her | 
 enlarge | Author: Elizabeth George
Publisher: Harper
Category: Book
List Price: $7.99
Buy Used: $0.01
You Save: $7.98 (100%)
New (67) Used (222) Collectible (4) from $0.01
Avg. Customer Rating:  45 reviews
Sales Rank: 16810
Media: Mass Market Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 736
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8
Dimensions (in): 6.7 x 4.2 x 1.4
ISBN: 0060545631
Dewey Decimal Number: 813.54
EAN: 9780060545635
ASIN: 0060545631
Publication Date: September 1, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: With pride from Motor City. All books guaranteed. Best Service, best prices.
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
A kind and well-loved woman was brutally and inexplicably murdered—the pregnant wife of a respected police inspector—and her death has left Scotland Yard shocked and searching for answers. Perhaps most horrifying of all, the trigger of the weapon that killed her was apparently pulled by a stranger . . . a twelve-year-old boy. The anatomy of a murder, the story of a family in crisis, What Came Before He Shot Her is a powerful, emotional novel full of deep psychological insights, a novel that only the incomparable Elizabeth George could write.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 40 more reviews...
 It's Different, Innit? September 28, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Though Elizabeth George thanks her editors for going along and supporting her decision to take up the Helen Lynley murder case once again, by digging deep into the London slum boy who committed the crime, anyone can read between the lines and imagine the strangled gasp of horror that must have attended the editors hearing this disastrous news.
They may have feigned enthusiasm to please a favored author, but inwardly they must have known what life would be like from now on. They would be forced to wade through hundreds of murky pages of seedy slumdwellers with improbable accents, the very bottom of the barrel sort of people whom their creator must have researched by multiple readings of LET NO MAN WRITE MY EPITAPH and also by watching Wesley Snipes in BLADE. Not since Nelson Algren have the lives of the wretched been told with so much camp value, and not since the days of Reconstruction has any white woman gone in and mangled so many clack and mixed race accents without a care in the world except telling a good story and pointing out racial injustice.
Oh well the world of the book editor, trying to rein in a bestseller with a bee in her bonnet, has never been a safe place, and these poor men and women probably at least told themselves, we will only be alienating about half of her former fans, and there will still be many more still standing to buy CARELESS IN RED, people who really love Barbara Havers and savor her interactions with Linley, and someday in the future the locution, "Jo-ell," will drop completely out of their brain banks.
All in all, it's a complete departure for Elizabeth George and a study in sociopathology to rival, well, not Dostoevsky.
 George understands poverty. September 6, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
This book is a powerful and riveting account of what happens to children in poverty when they are faced with limited choices, inadequate or ineffective family support, and the laws of the street. The author absolutely knows and understands the issues of living in poverty, and indeed, she taught for many years in Santa Ana, CA. Part of the power of this book is the author's ability to empathize with her characters and explain their behavior to those who don't. But those of you who think this kind of environment is limited to the streets of West London, think again. Having worked and lived in poverty environments both in Boston, MA, and Long Beach, CA, I can attest to the similar challenges faced by our own urban poor.
Accidental find September 6, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
I read this book because I began to read "Careless in Red" and got the impression that I should read the prior book first. Oddly, I read "What happened before he shot her" and enjoyed it. I then started "Careless" and stopped reading it about a third of the way through. Enjoyed the other one though.
Good concept but... September 4, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I am a huge fan of Elizabeth George's Inspector Lynley series, but I must admit that I feel very ambivalent about "What Came Before He Shot Her". It is a hugely ambitious prequel to "With No One As Witness" and explores the chaotic series of events leading up to the shocking (and, I must say, shockingly inexplicable) murder of Inspector Lynley's wife of a few months, Lady Helen. Whilst Lady Helen has always been a supremely irritating character, I would have much preferred George to have knocked off that tedious megabore, Deborah St James. Now there's a character that needs to be excised from the Inspector Lynley series, post haste. She is as dull as ditchwater!!! Whilst I found the novel readable, I can't really say that I enjoyed it. The book explores the relentlessly bleak lives of the Campbell siblings Vanessa, Joel and Toby, half-caste black children living in London. I was disappointed in the cookie-cutter stereotyping of the characters in the books - the black women were all raging hose beasts, ready to have sex with any male in their immediate vicinity, the black males were all drug dealers, stoners or street thugs, with only one exception. I found the Jamaican dialect spoken by the characters difficult to follow at times and the non-stop catalogue of woes befalling the main characters wouldn't have been out-of-place in a Lemony Snicket novel. Perhaps the novel should have been called "A Series of Unfortunate Events, Part 2". Whilst I applaud Ms George for undertaking such an ambitious writing project, I think it fell short of its mark. It was also FAR too long and did not need 707 pages to tell the story. It needed much more judicious editing and could have easily been 200 pages shorter, at the very least.
 Interesting characters being unnecessarily tortured August 1, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I've read all the previous EG books (I think), and like them a lot (I'm addicted to British mysteries), but have always found them rather self-indulgent in being padded out with endless details, descriptions, and plot curlicues that don't end up mattering much. [She must get paid by the page.] What I like in this book is the character development, especially Kendra and Joel: I kept being about to drop the book in the trash but then would want to see what happens to these tragic people. But knowing what the end-point is makes it even harder to wade through too many hundred pages of misery and difficult dialect to see what zigs and zags might intervene before the ultimate tragedy. [And I don't mean Helen -- she should have been knocked off for too much whinging long ago.] And the self-indulgence here is not just nattering on to fill the pages: I have no idea if the dialect is correct ("innit?"), but the racial stereotypes are disappointing in an author who can create the complex Joel -- not just that all the people of color are so hopeless or thwarted in their talents, but all the white folks except the cops are ineffectively Good and Well-Meaning. There's no suspense, not really any creative 'explanation' of why a poor boy ends up doing dreadful things [didn't we all know this piece of sociology already?], just torture -- of the characters and us. Sadistic, all in all.
|
|
|
Site by: Troy Peterson | |
