| Accessories By Manufacturer | |
|
|
Email Newsletter
Get info on Sales, Events, New Products, and More!
|
|
|
|
| | Mary Queen of Scots |  | Author: Antonia Fraser Publisher: Random House Value Publishing Category: Book
List Price: $7.99 Buy Used: $2.45 You Save: $5.54 (69%)
New (3) Used (15) Collectible (2) from $2.45
Avg. Customer Rating: 48 reviews Sales Rank: 522879
Media: Hardcover Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 613
ISBN: 0517414244 Dewey Decimal Number: 941.1050924 EAN: 9780517414248 ASIN: 0517414244
Publication Date: December 12, 1988 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Condition: Shows some signs of wear, and may have some markings on the inside. 100% Money Back Guarantee.
|
| Also Available In:
| • | Hardcover - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - Mary, Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS | | • | Hardcover - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - Mary, Queen of Scots | | • | Paperback - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - Mary, Queen of Scots | | • | Paperback - Mary Queen of Scots (A Methuen Paperback) | | • | Unknown Binding - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - Mary, Queen of Scots, | | • | Mass Market Paperback - Mary, Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - Mary Queen Of Scots | | • | Paperback - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Paperback - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Paperback - Mary, Queen of Scots | | • | Paperback - Mary, Queen of Scots | | • | Paperback - Mary Queen of Scots (Dell 5476) | | • | Paperback - Mary Queen of Scots (Women in History) | | • | Audio Cassette - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Audio Cassette - Mary Queen of Scots | | • | Hardcover - Mary, Queen of Scots | | • | Unknown Binding - Emergency welfare work and employment: An independent evaluation of Utah's emergency work program, final report, 1984-1991 | | • | Unknown Binding - Mary, Queen of Scots |
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description More than four hundred years after her death, Mary Queen of Scots remains one of the most romantic and controversial figures in British history. Antonia Fraser's classic biography of her won the James Tait Prize when it was first published in 1969, became an international bestseller and was translated into nine languages.Mary passed her childhood in France and married the Dauphin to become Queen of France at the age of sixteen. Widowed less than two years later, she returned to Scotland as Queen after an absence of thirteen years. Her life then entered its best known phas: the early struggles with John Knox, and the unruly Scottish nobility; the fatal marriage to Darnley and his mysterious death; her marriage to Bothwell, the chief suspect, that led directly to her long English captivity at the hands of Queen Elizabeth; the poignant and extraordinary story of her long imprisonment that ended with the labyrinthine Babington plot to free her, and her execution at the age of forty-four. Antonia Fraser's biography, four years in the writing, enters fully into the life of an historical figure who continues to capture the popular imagination, and provides a moving answer to the question, `What was Mary Queen of Scots really like?' `Lady Antonia Fraser tells Mary's story movingly and yet witih scholarship, insight and balance. It is the sort of biography of Mary which has long been needed.' The Scotsman `A fluent narrative style, a perfect eye for physical detail, a rich sense of the black comedy that the period demands and a high feeling for the central tragedy' Sunday Times
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 43 more reviews...
Brave but flawed effort January 5, 2009 If this book were a disseratation, I'd give it full marks for being fully researched, almost to the point of overkill. The problem is that Ms. Fraser is a bit too much in love with her subject for the book's own good--and this is perhaps not suprising, given that Mary was one who did inspire extreme feelings of either love or loathing. My own hunch is that Mary, in common with any number of other Stuart monarchs, would have made a delightful dinner guest but, as ruler, proves that a good judicious mix of Plantagenet, Tudor and, yes, even Windsor qualities actually gets the work done.
Fantastic November 13, 2008 This is the book that got me started reading about history in the first place, 10 years ago. It must be pretty good, at the time I was partying my butt off in SF and reading wasn't the first thing on my mind. I picked it up, couldn't put it down and haven't put down a book since. Read it, it rocks.
Well written and researched - but not objective June 10, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Overall, this is a well-written and well-researched biography, although not objective enough about its subject. I appreciated the beautiful writing and the thorough scholarship of this book, although in the end I could not share the author's unqualified admiration for Mary Queen of Scots.
Ms. Fraser presents enough evidence to convince me that Mary probably was not involved beforehand in her second husband Darnley's murder, and that the infamous Casket Letters were probably forgeries or interpolations of other letters. She was certainly not prepared by her French upbringing to deal with the problems she found in Scotland, and was very ill-served by the brutal Scottish lords there, including her own half-brother.
However, Mary apparently did willingly marry her husband's murderer, which cost her the love of her subjects; willingly fled to England even though she knew she was seen as a rival to Queen Elizabeth's throne; and later on became involved in conspiracies in England to overthrow Elizabeth, which virtually forced Elizabeth to have her executed. Even Ms. Fraser cannot explain away these naive and reckless actions, although she tries. Her bias towards her subject is rather obvious. I also shared other readers' frustration with the many untranslated French and Latin phrases, which slows down the reading for those of us not fluent in those languages.
exelant February 28, 2008 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
amazing book makes you feel as if you want to be in that world most touching and amazingly well written with no bias and no dodgy facts very good choice of language
Over all very good, but definitely biased January 6, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Before this book, I'd only just gotten started on my Mary Stuart research, having only read two "semi-biographies"(Mary and Elizabeth by Jane Dunn & Mary Queen of Scots and the Murder of Darnley) of her. I was hesitant about buying the book because I read the reviews of it on here and it sounded ugly. But I'm very glad I did buy it, because now I am much, much better informed on the subject of Mary than before.
I'm an Antonia Fraser fan, and this book is written in her usual poetic and heart-warming style. She is, I'd have to say, among my favorite historical biographers. She is clearly very passionate about her subject and I was able to sympathize with Mary throughout. Likewise, she is very good about referencing unlike her counterpart Alison Weir.
I'd have to disagree with the reviewers who said this book made Mary out to be saintly. She is portrayed, in my opinion, as sweet and strong, but by no means perfect. There were times in the bio when I thought she was extremely foolish, and often times I was out and out annoyed by her. I agreed with Fraser's conclusion that Mary probably did not try kill her second husband, Henry Darnley and that it was a political set-up. I also agree with her about the Casket Letters. I'm on the fence about Bothwell. I think many of his actions are not at odds with a rapist and abductor. Likewise, I don't see how or why he would proceed to murder Darnley and just hope that Mary would marry him, which could mean prompt execution or life imprisonment. But I didn't mark this against Fraser, because I'm still trying to figure out what I feel on the subject, and also because she convincingly argued her side.
I do take issue with a few slender things in the book. For one, I love Fraser's style, but I did find her constant use of footnotes distracting*. And I definitely agree with the reviewers who said it was biased against Elizabeth. Some of the commentary, such as sharp jabs at Elizabeth's beauty and lifestyle, were entirely editorial and completely uncalled for. Fraser degraded Elizabeth so hard at times that I felt her case for Mary might have been a little too weak. I've read several books on Elizabeth and none so far have made petty, out of place remarks about Mary and rightly so. Both were interesting, incredible women and one need not be knocked down at the expense of the other. This bio would have gotten five stars had there been a little more objectivity.
*Most of them I felt could have been worked conveniently into the narrative.
|
|
| Site by: Troy Peterson | |