| Accessories By Manufacturer | |
|
|
Email Newsletter
Get info on Sales, Events, New Products, and More!
|
|
|
|
| | Death of Superman |  | Authors: Jerry Ordway, Louise Simonson, Roger Stern
Creator: Dan Jurgens
Publisher: Topeka Bindery
Category: Book
Buy New: $19.85
Avg. Customer Rating:  72 reviews
Media: Library Binding
Number Of Items: 1
ISBN: 1417816414
Dewey Decimal Number: 741
EAN: 9781417816415
ASIN: 1417816414
Publication Date: March 2008
Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping
Availability: Usually ships in 2 to 4 weeks
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Review
The Death of Superman was a 1992 stunt that turned out to be DC's bestselling Superman comic ever. The massive 11-issue crossover among four different series (Superman, Superman: The Man of Steel, Action Comics, and Justice League of America) introduces an unstoppable alien named Doomsday who creates a path of destruction on his way to the heart of Metropolis and whom Superman must stop at any cost. It's of interest as a milestone of the Superman mythos (though of course the outcome didn't last), but casual fans might be underwhelmed by the unfamiliar villain and the unfamiliar Justice League (with Booster Gold, Blue Beetle, and other minor heroes rather than the traditional lineup), the drawn-out story (by Dan Jurgens, Jerry Ordway, Louise Simonson, and Roger Stern), and the ordinary art (by Jurgens, Jon Bogadanove, Tom Grummett, and Jackson Guice). --David Horiuchi
Product Description
The bestselling edition that tells the staggering story of Superman's demise has been one of DC's best sellers since its release in January, 1992. THE DEATH OF SUPERMAN, the opening volume of the saga of Superman's death and rebirth, introduced the unstoppable death dealer known as Doomsday. Graphic novel format.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 67 more reviews...
Great Action September 7, 2008
There are comics that make have revolutionary writing and make you think (this is not it) and then there are really exciting, thrilling, non-stop action comics (this is it!) so if you enjoy the latter you will enjoy this book. There are some people who complain about the politics that concern the making of this book and to that, who cares, it's just a fictious story. True, it is controversial to kill of the Man of Steel but the actual fight between Superman and Doomsday literally spans several issues so Superman's death did not result from a small battle. Contrary to what people say, I think the writers are wise not to give Doomsday any history or have him talk. Doing any of these two things will result in your opponent getting the upperhand. It is very exciting and emotional at the end and the artwork is pretty decent especially in the last or two issues.
Essential, but room for improvement September 7, 2008
Superman fans are basically required to pick this up, as this story arc set the DC universe on its head. To cut it short, a mysterious creature named Doomsday appears, creates a path of destruction across the country (taking out several Justice League members along the way) before fighting Superman in a climactic battle at the steps of the Daily Planet, where both kill each other.
The art is pretty good overall, but that's an average - the final installment is masterfully done, but some of the middle chapters look rushed, as if they were scrambling to meet the deadline.
The plot is a point of contention for many comic fans - there's one camp that likes that a totally new, mysterious character was the one that did Superman in, and another camp that believes an established character, such as Brainiac or Lex Luthor, should have been the one to fell the Man of Steel. While I am okay with the concept of a new character getting the honor, the almost total absence of all the other villains throughout Death of Superman, World Without a Superman and Return of Superman left me wondering. Lex Luthor II makes a few token appearances, mostly in Return of Superman, but even then he doesn't do much other than argue a TV contract. Shouldn't he have been, I don't know, moving forward with his plan of world domination now that his only roadblock (Superman) is dead?
In short, this essential pickup is a good read, but it could have been better. It's entertaining for the first few reads, but it leaves us wanting more substance amidst the mindless destruction of Doomsday.
 A Must Read August 4, 2008
I loved this book when I was younger, because it was just so famous when it came out, it really changed the DC Universe. The book has lost it's luster as I got a little older, however it is still a must read for any Superman fan.
 A death without dignity or respect July 31, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
It's taken a long time for comics to get where they are today. At the present, comics are widely regarded as a serious art form, although the medium still has a long way to go before everyone buys that. It's true, though. Unfortunately, when most people think of comics, they think of the original comics from the '40s, '50s, and '60s, back when Batman and Robin were fighting "Blockbuster," a villain who could kill Batman with his flashlight, or when Lois Lane could only watch helplessly as Superman was inexplicably transformed into a tree. Those comics were ridiculous. They couldn't help it -- I mean, that's what comics were. No one thought of pushing it farther. But then, in the 1970s, the writers tried pushing things forward a bit. The turning point: 1986, when Frank Miller's legendary "Batman: The Dark Knight Returns" was published to ecstatic praise and major public attention. That book was a structured, clever, thoughtful, and complex narrative that proved comics could be more than pretty adventures for kids. Later that year, Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons concocted "Watchmen." "Watchmen" was not only the best comic book of all time, but one of the best novels of the 20th century, even winding up on TIME magazine's list of the 100 Best Novels of the 20th Century. Since then, the medium has continued to produce thought-provoking, intellectual, challenging pieces of work -- for the most part.
Which is why "The Death of Superman," which collects issues published from October to November of 2002, is so despicable. Heralded as the best-selling graphic novel of all time (which is often challenged by fans; a more likely candidate is "Arkham Asylum," published in 1989), "The Death of Superman" arc caused a massive stir when it was being published. News agencies around the globe covered the news. DC Comics was killing the Man of Steel, the original comic book superhero, for good (or so people thought). So imagine the disappointment and outrage when, a little over half a year later, Superman was resurrected. Turns out he was able to harness the sun's rays to "hibernate" during his death.
Personally, I think killing Superman is an awful, awful idea. To kill Batman makes sense. Batman is human, after all, and with his shenanigans it wouldn't be that surprising if someone finally struck down the Dark Knight. But Superman is not human. He is not someone plagued with ordinary human problems. He is a god. Most importantly, he is hope. He had been the shining beacon of hope for legions of comic fans young and old since debuting in 1939. DC didn't care. To generate more publicity for their comics, which were losing readers, they decided to kill him off. DC killed off hope. There is little that they could have done that would be more cruel.
They went even farther, though. It's one thing to give a superhero a fitting death, or even a vaguely plausible one. But "The Death of Superman" is brainless rubbish. Out of the blue, some kind of alien juggernaut (whose origins aren't addressed during this arc), nicknamed "Doomsday," appears on Earth and proceeds to destroy everything in his path without even breaking a sweat. He's unstoppable. He easily wipes out the Justice League, and then just keeps truckin' to Metropolis, where, as Jimmy Olsen, Lois Lane, and the Kents watch, Doomsday strikes down Superman. Of course, Superman kills Doomsday in the process -- but not until Doomsday has inexplicably destroyed Superman.
Now, it would have been one thing to have Lex Luthor, Braniac, or one of the classic Superman villains come up with some devious plan to get rid of Superman. Instead, the writers created a villain out of nowhere, offering no explanation whatsoever as to how this random alien is able to easily kill Superman, and apparently feeling one wasn't necessary. Doomsday is a creation without any sort of intricacy or thought put into him. He was created solely to wipe out Superman in a way that wouldn't allow people to ask questions. As if that's not bad enough, along the way we have to put up with absurdly bad writing, which harkens back to the comic days of old. Back then, they didn't know any better. They were doing their best. By 1992, after the publication of "Dark Knight Returns," "Watchmen," or any comics like those, they should have known better.
For comic fans, "The Death of Superman" is required reading. After all, Superman dies. But it won't be an easy read. It's painful, dull, and often laughably bad. Its insulting simplicity and stupidity should make any true Superman fan quake with rage. Because the truth is, if books like "The Dark Knight Returns" or "Watchmen" moved the medium ahead 60 years, then comics like "The Death of Superman" set the medium back a solid 30 years anyway. It's just like superhero movies. Yeah, you can have an "X2" or "Spider-Man 2" that pushes the genre ahead, or even something like "The Dark Knight," which erases the concept of "genre" completely. But then you can have something like "Catwoman" or "Superman IV: The Quest for Peace," and, well, after those, it's going to get a little harder to take superhero movies seriously. Ultimately, "The Death of Superman" is contemptible for its inexcusable execution, but it is truly despicable for doing one of the worst things human beings can do: exterminate hope.
Doomsday Wrecks Havoc May 15, 2008
From the very beginning, Doomsday (the bad guy) has the only intent of going berserk, and beating up people who gets in his way. Justice League battles him, but gets beaten. Why is this Doomsday so powerful, we don't get to know. Superman battles him, and as we all know ends up losing the fight. The whole book is nothing but fighting, Justice League and Superman fighting Doomsday. There's no rest. I didn't follow the Superman books when this storyline was written, so I don't know why Superman ultimately became vulnerable to Doomsday. I thought his only weakness was Kryptonite and magic, but Doomsday seem to beat him by brute strength. I bought this book because I heard this was the best selling graphic novel of all time, and it do have historic value, because death of Superman was a big deal. I recommend this book to all Superman fans, because its an important chapter in the character and DC universe.
|
|
|
Site by: Troy Peterson | |
